Information Technology(IT) has found its way into judicial practice to cure'late justice'that occurs across the world. Singapore, as a successful example, has drawn tremendous attention. It is quite different from country to country on how to introduce IT. The UK courts have followed a top- down strategy, i.e., national plans and legislation usually go before practical operation at local levels. China, as a late-comer in terms of modernisation or informatization, has followed a bottom-up model, which refers to such a situation where local courts implemented IT programmes at their own discretion. The situation was like'one hundred flowers bloom'. After more than 20 years' exploration, great achievements have been made, together with impressive drawbacks. The most pressing is lack of uniformity. Despite the potential new functions of Information Technology was applied in the judiciary, it remains a striking situation that overall judicial efficiency has not evidently been boosted. At least, the use of IT does not amount to complete satisfaction of the public. It is essential that China learns from the UK; especially if the SPC is supposed to promote national uniformity of laws and court rules in terms of IT application. In addition,'Bucket Theory'demands that efforts should be made to help out the' poorest ' before Chinese courts implement the dream of informatization. To our delight, the SPC formulated the Five-Year Plan for Information Construction at the People's Courts(2013- 2017), carried forward the construction of a nationwide court information network, known as'Scale Project', to comprehensively elevate the information-based level. The SPC has also established and is implementing the Fourth Five-Year Reform Plan of the People's Courts(2014-2018), which includes a series of plans to strengthen informatization construction. It is worth to embrace informatization 3.0 at People's Courts by the end of 2017.